SUMMARY
Abstract
This clinical study evaluates the thermal profiles and tissue contraction efficacy of different radiofrequency (RF) delivery methods, specifically comparing InMode’s bipolar RFAL devices (BodyTite, FaceTite, AccuTite) with plasma-driven RF devices. The research aims to determine which technology offers superior soft tissue contraction while maintaining safety.
Conclusion
The study concludes that InMode’s bipolar RFAL devices, such as BodyTite, provide more controlled and deeper thermal effects compared to plasma-driven RF devices. This results in more effective soft tissue contraction and skin tightening. The findings support the use of BodyTite and similar technologies for achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes in tissue remodeling procedures.
TOPICS COVERED
- Comparison of bipolar RFAL (BodyTite, FaceTite, AccuTite) with plasma-driven RF devices.
- Analysis of thermal profiles and their impact on tissue contraction.
- Discussion on the Arrhenius relationship between temperature and time in collagen contraction.
- Evaluation of the depth and uniformity of thermal effects in different RF technologies.
